A Common Law Approach to the Parties' Intention in Arbitration Agreements

Ilias Bantekas*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Offer and acceptance must be supplemented by the parties' common intention, failing which there is no contract. Arbitration clauses are separable from the contract in which they are contained and hence constitute distinct contracts, albeit of a procedural nature. Even so, the courts typically conflate the parties' common intention as expressed or implied in the main contract with the common intention required in the arbitration clause. Although technically incorrect, courts in the common law tradition are generally content with this approach and do not question its rationale. The article argues that while such an approach is acceptable, there may well be cases where a party can validly argue that this conflated common intention was misplaced.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)189-196
Number of pages8
JournalGlobal Journal of Comparative Law
Volume12
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2023

Keywords

  • arbitration
  • common law
  • contracts
  • intention

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A Common Law Approach to the Parties' Intention in Arbitration Agreements'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this