A comparative study on selective adsorption of metal ions using aminated adsorbents

Len Foong Koong, Koon Fung Lam, John Barford, Gordon McKay*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

60 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

It is well-known that chitosan consists of amino groups for the chelation of metal ions while NH2-MCM-41 has excellent adsorption selectivities for metals. This work compares both adsorption capacities and selectivities of chitosan and NH2-MCM-41. It has been found that chitosan has adsorption capacities of 1.76mmol/g, 1.03mmol/g and 1.30mmol/g for Cu2+, Ni2+ and Zn2+ respectively whereas NH2-MCM-41 has adsorption capacity of 1.52mmol/g, 0.8mmol/g and 0.83mmol/g for Cu2+, Ni2+ and Zn2+. The higher adsorption capacity in chitosan is attributed to its higher loading of amine groups. The single component adsorption isotherms were well-fitted using Freundlich model. The binary adsorptions of Cu2+-Zn2+ and Ni2+-Zn2+ systems showed similar adsorption selectivities for both adsorbents. However, chitosan has no preferential adsorption for Ni2+-Zn2+ system while NH2-MCM-41 has a good selectivity towards Zn2+. It is believed that the difference can be attributed to the heterogeneous surface of chitosan due to its organic nature. The multi-component adsorptions were best described by a multicomponent extended Freundlich model. Despite the surface functional group, this work indicates the importance of the adsorbent support on selective adsorption.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)230-240
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Colloid and Interface Science
Volume395
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Apr 2013
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Adsorption
  • Chitosan
  • MCM-41
  • Mesoporous silica
  • Selectivity

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A comparative study on selective adsorption of metal ions using aminated adsorbents'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this