A Systematic Literature Review of the Blood Supply Chain through Bibliometric Analysis and Taxonomy

Gul Imamoglu*, Y. Ilker Topcu, Nezir Aydin

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The blood supply chain is an inseparable part of health systems. The importance of blood and the difficulties of managing the blood supply chain have led to numerous publications on this topic over the last two decades. This study seeks to reveal the state of the art of the blood supply chain and provide research gaps and future research directions. For this purpose, a mixed review methodology is conducted that includes bibliometric analysis, network analysis, and a six-dimension taxonomy. Bibliometric analysis identifies the most contributing journals, authors, and countries as well as provides popular keywords, while network analysis reveals interactions between these components. Taxonomy clarifies decision models and research gaps with a deeper examination. The electronic database Web of Science is examined to uncover relevant articles. In total, 265 articles are analyzed in detail. The findings reveal that the blood supply chain gathers more interest from researchers, and despite the continuing dominance of the inventory stage, there is an upward trend in the literature for the research of the blood supply chain as a whole. Optimization techniques come forward in the blood supply chain topic as solution methodology. In accordance with the results of bibliometric analysis, network analysis, and taxonomy, six prospective directions for future research are emphasized.

Original languageEnglish
Article number124
JournalSystems
Volume11
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2023
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • bibliometric analysis
  • blood supply chain
  • literature review
  • network analysis
  • taxonomy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A Systematic Literature Review of the Blood Supply Chain through Bibliometric Analysis and Taxonomy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this