'A tradition of forgetting': Stabilisation and humanitarian action in historical perspective

Sultan Barakat*, Seán Deely, Steven A. Zyck

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

35 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

While subject to increasing articulation and institutionalisation, stabilisation is a long-standing concept and practice that has consistently engaged with and, at times, conflicted with varied understandings of humanitarianism and humanitarian action. Reviewing selected historical experiences, including the Philippines (1898-1902), Algeria (1956-62), Vietnam (1967-75) and El Salvador (1980-92), this paper argues that contemporary models of stabilisation build on and repeat mistakes of the past, particularly the overt securitisation of aid and the perception that humanitarian and development actors are able to purchase security effectively. Where current stabilisation differs from its earlier incarnations, as in the introduction of the private sector and incorporation of humanitarian action into war-fighting strategies, the implications are shown to be troubling if not outright disastrous. T his examination of historical experience, which includes many failures and few, if any, successes, raises the likelihood that it is not solely the design or implementation of individual stability operations that require modification but perhaps the entire concept of stabilisation itself.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)S297-S319
JournalDisasters
Volume34
Issue numberSUPPL. 3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2010
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Counter-insurgency
  • Humanitarian action
  • Pacification
  • Post-conflict reconstruction
  • Stabilisation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of ''A tradition of forgetting': Stabilisation and humanitarian action in historical perspective'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this