Abortion in the Hanbali school of jurisprudence: A systematic ethical approach

Mu'taz Al-Khatib*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The Hanbali legal reasoning, by and large, draws on the text-based approach in isolation from the mere human opinions in an attempt to apply all texts as much as possible. Like other jurists, the Hanbali jurists believe that a fetus goes through three stages of development: nutfa (mixed of male and female gametes), alaqa (a clot of blood), and mudgha (chewed piece of meat), and each lasts for forty days before ensoulment occurs when it becomes a person. An abortion may take place in the stage of nutfa, since it is valueless. However, it is prohibited during the other two stages. Such prohibition is stricter after ensoulment. This general rule is equally applied to all natural and exceptional cases. However, some contemporary fatwas permit abortion in case the mother's life is in danger even after the ensoulment. For the Hanbali School, the fetus is generally, not absolutely, independent; the fetal life is not entirely perfect, since it depends on her mother's life. As to fetal malformation and similar emergencies, they are not legal excuses for abortion.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationAbortion
Subtitle of host publicationGlobal Positions and Practices, Religious and Legal Perspectives
PublisherSpringer International Publishing
Pages155-167
Number of pages13
ISBN (Electronic)9783030630232
ISBN (Print)9783030630225
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 13 Apr 2021

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Abortion in the Hanbali school of jurisprudence: A systematic ethical approach'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this