TY - JOUR
T1 - Advancing open-source visual analytics in digital pathology
T2 - A systematic review of tools, trends, and clinical applications
AU - Ahmad, Zahoor
AU - Alzubaidi, Mahmood
AU - Al-Thelaya, Khaled
AU - Calí, Corrado
AU - Boughorbel, Sabri
AU - Schneider, Jens
AU - Agus, Marco
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 The Author(s)
PY - 2025/5/23
Y1 - 2025/5/23
N2 - Histopathology is critical for disease diagnosis, and digital pathology has transformed traditional workflows by digitizing slides, enabling remote consultations, and enhancing analysis through computational methods. In this systematic review, we evaluated open-source visual analytics abilities in digital pathology by screening 254 studies and including 52 that met predefined criteria. Our analysis reveals that these solutions—comprising abilities (n = 29), software (n = 13), and frameworks (n = 10)—are predominantly applied in cancer research (e.g., breast, colon, ovarian, and prostate cancers) and primarily utilize whole slide images. Key contributions include advanced image analysis capabilities (as demonstrated by platforms such as QuPath and CellProfiler) and the integration of machine learning for diagnostic support, treatment planning, automated tissue segmentation, and collaborative research. Despite these promising advancements, challenges such as high computational demands, limited external validation, and difficulties integrating into clinical workflows remain. Future research should focus on establishing standardized validation frameworks, aligning with regulatory requirements, and enhancing user-centric designs to promote robust, interoperable solutions for clinical adoption.
AB - Histopathology is critical for disease diagnosis, and digital pathology has transformed traditional workflows by digitizing slides, enabling remote consultations, and enhancing analysis through computational methods. In this systematic review, we evaluated open-source visual analytics abilities in digital pathology by screening 254 studies and including 52 that met predefined criteria. Our analysis reveals that these solutions—comprising abilities (n = 29), software (n = 13), and frameworks (n = 10)—are predominantly applied in cancer research (e.g., breast, colon, ovarian, and prostate cancers) and primarily utilize whole slide images. Key contributions include advanced image analysis capabilities (as demonstrated by platforms such as QuPath and CellProfiler) and the integration of machine learning for diagnostic support, treatment planning, automated tissue segmentation, and collaborative research. Despite these promising advancements, challenges such as high computational demands, limited external validation, and difficulties integrating into clinical workflows remain. Future research should focus on establishing standardized validation frameworks, aligning with regulatory requirements, and enhancing user-centric designs to promote robust, interoperable solutions for clinical adoption.
KW - Cancer research
KW - Clinical implementation
KW - Computational pathology
KW - Digital pathology
KW - Histopathology
KW - Image analysis
KW - Machine learning in pathology
KW - Open-source
KW - Visual analytics
KW - Whole slide imaging
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=105008044718&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jpi.2025.100454
DO - 10.1016/j.jpi.2025.100454
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:105008044718
SN - 2229-5089
VL - 18
JO - Journal of Pathology Informatics
JF - Journal of Pathology Informatics
M1 - 100454
ER -