Commentaries on Viewpoint: V̇o2peak is an acceptable estimate of cardiorespiratory fitness but not V̇o2max

Li Zuo; Tingyang Zhou; Davide Malatesta; Stefano Lanzi; Grégoire P. Millet; S. Pogliaghi; D. H. Paterson; J. M. Murias; Stephan van der Zwaard; Richard T. Jaspers; Willem J. van der Laarse

doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00687.2018

Commentaries on Viewpoint: V̇o_2peak is an acceptable estimate of cardiorespiratory fitness but not V̇o_2max

Li Zuo, Tingyang Zhou, Davide Malatesta, Stefano Lanzi, Grégoire P. Millet, S. Pogliaghi, D. H. Paterson, J. M. Murias, Stephan van der Zwaard, Richard T. Jaspers, Willem J. van der Laarse

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate

3 Citations (Scopus)

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	966-967
Number of pages	2
Journal	Journal of Applied Physiology
Volume	125
Issue number	3
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00687.2018
Publication status	Published - 1 Sept 2018
Externally published	Yes

Access to Document

10.1152/japplphysiol.00687.2018

Cite this

Zuo, L., Zhou, T., Malatesta, D., Lanzi, S., Millet, G. P., Pogliaghi, S., Paterson, D. H., Murias, J. M., van der Zwaard, S., Jaspers, R. T., & van der Laarse, W. J. (2018). Commentaries on Viewpoint: V̇o_2peak is an acceptable estimate of cardiorespiratory fitness but not V̇o_2max. Journal of Applied Physiology, 125(3), 966-967. https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00687.2018

@article{22eaaf22e84e4c70895b59bf65993c6f,

title = "Commentaries on Viewpoint: {\.V}o2peak is an acceptable estimate of cardiorespiratory fitness but not {\.V}o2max",

author = "Li Zuo and Tingyang Zhou and Davide Malatesta and Stefano Lanzi and Millet, {Gr{\'e}goire P.} and S. Pogliaghi and Paterson, {D. H.} and Murias, {J. M.} and {van der Zwaard}, Stephan and Jaspers, {Richard T.} and {van der Laarse}, {Willem J.}",

year = "2018",

month = sep,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1152/japplphysiol.00687.2018",

language = "English",

volume = "125",

pages = "966--967",

journal = "Journal of Applied Physiology",

issn = "8750-7587",

publisher = "American Physiological Society",

number = "3",

}

Zuo, L, Zhou, T, Malatesta, D, Lanzi, S, Millet, GP, Pogliaghi, S, Paterson, DH, Murias, JM, van der Zwaard, S, Jaspers, RT & van der Laarse, WJ 2018, 'Commentaries on Viewpoint: V̇o_2peak is an acceptable estimate of cardiorespiratory fitness but not V̇o_2max', Journal of Applied Physiology, vol. 125, no. 3, pp. 966-967. https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00687.2018

TY - JOUR

T1 - Commentaries on Viewpoint

T2 - V̇o2peak is an acceptable estimate of cardiorespiratory fitness but not V̇o2max

AU - Zuo, Li

AU - Zhou, Tingyang

AU - Malatesta, Davide

AU - Lanzi, Stefano

AU - Millet, Grégoire P.

AU - Pogliaghi, S.

AU - Paterson, D. H.

AU - Murias, J. M.

AU - van der Zwaard, Stephan

AU - Jaspers, Richard T.

AU - van der Laarse, Willem J.

PY - 2018/9/1

Y1 - 2018/9/1

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85072710706&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1152/japplphysiol.00687.2018

DO - 10.1152/japplphysiol.00687.2018

M3 - Comment/debate

C2 - 30260762

AN - SCOPUS:85072710706

SN - 8750-7587

VL - 125

SP - 966

EP - 967

JO - Journal of Applied Physiology

JF - Journal of Applied Physiology

IS - 3

ER -

Commentaries on Viewpoint: V̇o2peak is an acceptable estimate of cardiorespiratory fitness but not V̇o2max

Access to Document

Other files and links

Cite this

Commentaries on Viewpoint: V̇o_2peak is an acceptable estimate of cardiorespiratory fitness but not V̇o_2max