Abstract
Chapter two constructs a comprehensive ethical framework to facilitate the analysis of intricate bioethical issues like incidental findings (IFs) in genomics. Drawing from both secular and Islamic traditions, it synthesizes Robert Veatch's multi-layered approach to bioethics and the recommendation by Muslim ethicists to engage diverse scholarly disciplines. The “Theoretical Level” section explores Islamic metaethics rooted in theology and legal theory, centering on aligning human actions with God’s will to achieve benefit and avert harm. It examines the process of religio-ethical reasoning (ijtihād) employed by Muslim scholars to discern divine guidance on novel issues. The “Practical Level” section outlines the fivefold classification scheme for categorizing human acts based on their moral value within the Islamic tradition: prohibited, obligatory, reprehensible, recommended, and permissible. Distinct from secular schemes, this classification’s theological foundations, definitions, and moral dimensions are elucidated. Bridging theory and practice, the chapter proposes utilizing this fivefold scheme as a nuanced tool to evaluate the ethical management of IFs. It advocates a dynamic approach, acknowledging how evolving scientific understanding may shift the categorization of specific IFs over time. The chapter lays the groundwork for the subsequent analysis, where representative cases illustrating each ethical category are examined through the synthesized Islamic ethical lens, fostering constructive dialogue between religious and secular bioethical discourses on this complex issue.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Islamic Ethics and Incidental Findings |
| Publication status | Published - 2024 |