Corporate Governance, Opaque Bank Activities, and Risk/Return Efficiency: Pre- and Post-Crisis Evidence from Turkey

Olivier de Jonghe, Mustafa Disli*, Koen Schoors

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

25 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Does better corporate governance unambiguously improve the risk/return efficiency of banks? Or does either a re-orientation of banks' revenue mix towards more opaque products, an economic downturn, or tighter supervision create off-setting or reinforcing effects? The authors relate bank efficiency to shortfalls from a stochastic risk/return frontier. They analyze how internal governance mechanisms (CEO duality, board experience, political connections, and education profile) and external governance mechanisms (discipline exerted by shareholders, depositors, or skilled employees) determine efficiency in a sample of Turkish banks. The 2000 financial crisis was a wake-up call for bank efficiency and corporate governance. As a result, better corporate governance mechanisms have been able to improve risk/return efficiency when the economic, regulatory, and supervisory environments are more stable and bank products are more complex.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)51-80
Number of pages30
JournalJournal of Financial Services Research
Volume41
Issue number1-2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2012
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Bank risk
  • Corporate governance
  • Crisis
  • Frontier
  • Noninterest income

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Corporate Governance, Opaque Bank Activities, and Risk/Return Efficiency: Pre- and Post-Crisis Evidence from Turkey'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this