Abstract
Although the Model Law has, through article 9, settled that the application for interim measure is not incompatible with the arbitration agreement, it does not expressly stipulate whether the forum court enjoys the power to issue interim measures. Therefore, it was thought that the mere adoption by some regimes of article 9 may not be sufficient, in and of itself, to establish the power of the courts to issue interim measures, which in turn gave rise to the need for the formulation of a provision such as article 17J in the 2006 amendments to the Model Law.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Uncitral Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration |
| Subtitle of host publication | A Commentary |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press |
| Pages | 500-521 |
| Number of pages | 22 |
| ISBN (Electronic) | 9781108633376 |
| ISBN (Print) | 9781108498234 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Jan 2020 |