TY - GEN
T1 - Decoupled Active and Reactive Power Control without PLL Requirement for Differential Buck Converter
AU - Khan, Ahmad
AU - Hosseinzadehtaher, Mohsen
AU - Easley, Mitchell
AU - Shadmand, Mohammad B.
AU - Abu-Rub, Haitham
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 IEEE.
PY - 2020/10/11
Y1 - 2020/10/11
N2 - This paper presents a decoupled active and reactive power control for the differential buck converter. This control does not require phase locked loop (PLL) for synchronization. Also, it achieves active and reactive power control in a simple single control loop structure. The differential buck converter has the capability to compensate the double line frequency power ripple without relying on additional hardware. Particularly, the Common Mode (CM) operation is used for active double line frequency power ripple absorption. Whereas, the Differential Mode (DM) operation is used as an active and reactive power exchanging port between the converter and the grid at the point of common coupling (PCC). The motivation behind this paper proposal are: (i) to avoid PLL induced instabilities, especially, when connecting the differential buck converter with weak grid, and (ii) direct active and reactive power control for the differential buck in a single loop control. The theoretical analyses are verified with a 5 kW converter with only 50 µF decoupling capacitor connected to a weak grid.
AB - This paper presents a decoupled active and reactive power control for the differential buck converter. This control does not require phase locked loop (PLL) for synchronization. Also, it achieves active and reactive power control in a simple single control loop structure. The differential buck converter has the capability to compensate the double line frequency power ripple without relying on additional hardware. Particularly, the Common Mode (CM) operation is used for active double line frequency power ripple absorption. Whereas, the Differential Mode (DM) operation is used as an active and reactive power exchanging port between the converter and the grid at the point of common coupling (PCC). The motivation behind this paper proposal are: (i) to avoid PLL induced instabilities, especially, when connecting the differential buck converter with weak grid, and (ii) direct active and reactive power control for the differential buck in a single loop control. The theoretical analyses are verified with a 5 kW converter with only 50 µF decoupling capacitor connected to a weak grid.
KW - active and reactive power control
KW - active power decoupling
KW - Differential buck
KW - grid-connected converter
KW - grid-following converter
KW - grid-tied converter
KW - PLL-less
KW - weak grid
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85097134981&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1109/ECCE44975.2020.9235663
DO - 10.1109/ECCE44975.2020.9235663
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85097134981
T3 - ECCE 2020 - IEEE Energy Conversion Congress and Exposition
SP - 4994
EP - 4999
BT - ECCE 2020 - IEEE Energy Conversion Congress and Exposition
PB - Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
T2 - 12th Annual IEEE Energy Conversion Congress and Exposition, ECCE 2020
Y2 - 11 October 2020 through 15 October 2020
ER -