Forecasting the nearly unforecastable: why aren’t airline bookings adhering to the prediction algorithm?

Saravanan Thirumuruganathan, Soon gyo Jung, Dianne Ramirez Robillos, Joni Salminen, Bernard J. Jansen*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Using 27 million flight bookings for 2 years from a major international airline company, we built a Next Likely Destination model to ascertain customers’ next flight booking. The resulting model achieves an 89% predictive accuracy using historical data. A unique aspect of the model is the incorporation of self-competence, where the model defers when it cannot reasonably make a recommendation. We then compare the performance of the Next Likely Destination model in a real-life consumer study with 35,000 actual airline customers. In the user study, the model obtains a 51% predictive accuracy. What happened? The Individual Behavior Framework theory provides insights into possibly explaining this inconsistency in evaluation outcomes. Research results indicate that algorithmic approaches in competitive industries must account for shifting customer preferences, changes to the travel environment, and confounding business effects rather than relying solely on historical data.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)73-100
Number of pages28
JournalElectronic Commerce Research
Volume21
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2021

Keywords

  • Airlines
  • Prediction
  • Recommendation
  • Travel
  • User evaluation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Forecasting the nearly unforecastable: why aren’t airline bookings adhering to the prediction algorithm?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this