Forget About Electron Micrographs: A Novel Guide for Using 3D Models for Quantitative Analysis of Dense Reconstructions

Daniya J. Boges, Marco Agus, Pierre Julius Magistretti, Corrado Calì*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

With the rapid evolvement in the automation of serial micrographs, acquiring fast and reliably giga- to terabytes of data is becoming increasingly common. Optical, or physical sectioning, and subsequent imaging of biological tissue at high resolution, offers the chance to postprocess, segment, and reconstruct micro- and nanoscopical structures, and then reveal spatial arrangements previously inaccessible or hardly imaginable with simple, single section, two-dimensional images. In some cases, three-dimensional models highlighted peculiar morphologies in a way that two-dimensional representations cannot be considered representative of that particular object morphology anymore, like mitochondria for instance. Observations like these are taking scientists toward a more common use of 3D models to formulate functional hypothesis, based on morphology. Because such models are so rich in details, we developed tools allowing for performing qualitative, visual assessments, as well as quantification directly in 3D. In this chapter we will revise our working pipeline and show a step-by-step guide to analyze our dataset.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationNeuromethods
PublisherHumana Press Inc.
Pages263-304
Number of pages42
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2020
Externally publishedYes

Publication series

NameNeuromethods
Volume155
ISSN (Print)0893-2336
ISSN (Electronic)1940-6045

Keywords

  • 3D analysis
  • 3D models
  • 3D reconstruction
  • 3DEM
  • Morphology
  • Virtual reality

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Forget About Electron Micrographs: A Novel Guide for Using 3D Models for Quantitative Analysis of Dense Reconstructions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this