TY - JOUR
T1 - Guided experimental design for static nonparametric modeling
AU - Malluhi, Byanne
AU - Fezai, Radhia
AU - Kravaris, Costas
AU - Nounou, Hazem
AU - Al-Rawashdeh, Mamoun
AU - Nounou, Mohamed
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2024/10/5
Y1 - 2024/10/5
N2 - Sequential or goal-oriented experimental design methods help achieve the target cheaply and quickly. In this work, we exploit Bayesian Optimization to obtain accurate and reliable static models for physical phenomena in cases where parametric models are unavailable. Our Guided Design of Experiments (G-DoE) workflow is proposed with a purely explorative acquisition function and an empirical stopping criterion. Two stopping criteria are proposed, one that is based on convergence rates of the prediction uncertainty and another that is based on a tolerance limit. Stopping criteria thresholds are established by studying factors like noise level and dimension size and their impact on prediction uncertainty convergence. Furthermore, we compare the G-DoE framework with classical Full Factorial and Response Surface strategies in terms of the suggested number of experiments and corresponding accuracy of fit. The proposed algorithm is tested using a methanol synthesis reaction experiment, a vapor pressure experiment, and a synthetic example.
AB - Sequential or goal-oriented experimental design methods help achieve the target cheaply and quickly. In this work, we exploit Bayesian Optimization to obtain accurate and reliable static models for physical phenomena in cases where parametric models are unavailable. Our Guided Design of Experiments (G-DoE) workflow is proposed with a purely explorative acquisition function and an empirical stopping criterion. Two stopping criteria are proposed, one that is based on convergence rates of the prediction uncertainty and another that is based on a tolerance limit. Stopping criteria thresholds are established by studying factors like noise level and dimension size and their impact on prediction uncertainty convergence. Furthermore, we compare the G-DoE framework with classical Full Factorial and Response Surface strategies in terms of the suggested number of experiments and corresponding accuracy of fit. The proposed algorithm is tested using a methanol synthesis reaction experiment, a vapor pressure experiment, and a synthetic example.
KW - Bayesian Optimization
KW - Data-driven modeling
KW - Experimental design
KW - Reaction rate modeling
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85195865643&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ces.2024.120327
DO - 10.1016/j.ces.2024.120327
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85195865643
SN - 0009-2509
VL - 298
JO - Chemical Engineering Science
JF - Chemical Engineering Science
M1 - 120327
ER -