Impact Assessment and Environmental Evaluation of Various Ammonia Production Processes

Yusuf Bicer*, Ibrahim Dincer, Greg Vezina, Frank Raso

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

119 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Abstract: In the current study, conventional resources-based ammonia generation routes are comparatively studied through a comprehensive life cycle assessment. The selected ammonia generation options range from mostly used steam methane reforming to partial oxidation of heavy oil. The chosen ammonia synthesis process is the most common commercially available Haber-Bosch process. The essential energy input for the methods are used from various conventional resources such as coal, nuclear, natural gas and heavy oil. Using the life cycle assessment methodology, the environmental impacts of selected methods are identified and quantified from cradle to gate. The life cycle assessment outcomes of the conventional resources based ammonia production routes show that nuclear electrolysis-based ammonia generation method yields the lowest global warming and climate change impacts while the coal-based electrolysis options bring higher environmental problems. The calculated greenhouse gas emission from nuclear-based electrolysis is 0.48 kg CO2 equivalent while it is 13.6 kg CO2 per kg of ammonia for coal-based electrolysis method. Graphical Abstract: [InlineMediaObject not available: see fulltext.]

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)842-855
Number of pages14
JournalEnvironmental Management
Volume59
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 May 2017
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Ammonia
  • Conventional
  • Environmental effect
  • Fuel
  • Hydrogen
  • Life cycle assessment

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Impact Assessment and Environmental Evaluation of Various Ammonia Production Processes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this