TY - JOUR
T1 - Legal and Ethical Considerations of Artificial Intelligence for Residents in Post-Acute and Long-Term Care
AU - Solaiman, Barry
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 The Authors
PY - 2024/9
Y1 - 2024/9
N2 - This article proposes a framework for examining the ethical and legal concerns for using artificial intelligence (AI) in post-acute and long-term care (PA-LTC). It argues that established frameworks on health, AI, and the law should be adapted to specific care contexts. For residents in PA-LTC, their social, psychological, and mobility needs should act as a gauge for examining the benefits and risks of integrating AI into their care. Using those needs as a gauge, 4 areas of particular concern are identified. First, the threat that AI poses to the autonomy of residents can undermine their core needs. Second, how discrimination and bias in algorithmic decision-making can undermine Medicare coverage for PA-LTC, causing doctors' recommendations to be ignored and denying residents the care they are entitled to. Third, privacy rules concerning data use may undermine developers' ability to train accurate AI systems, limiting their usefulness in PA-LTC contexts. Fourth, the importance of obtaining consent before AI is used and discussions about how that care should continue if there are concerns about an ongoing decline in cognition. Together, these considerations elevate existing frameworks and adapt them to the contextspecific case of PA-LTC. It is hoped that future research will examine the legal implications of these matters in each of these specific cases. (c) 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of AMDA - The Society for Post-Acute and Long-Term Care Medicine. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
AB - This article proposes a framework for examining the ethical and legal concerns for using artificial intelligence (AI) in post-acute and long-term care (PA-LTC). It argues that established frameworks on health, AI, and the law should be adapted to specific care contexts. For residents in PA-LTC, their social, psychological, and mobility needs should act as a gauge for examining the benefits and risks of integrating AI into their care. Using those needs as a gauge, 4 areas of particular concern are identified. First, the threat that AI poses to the autonomy of residents can undermine their core needs. Second, how discrimination and bias in algorithmic decision-making can undermine Medicare coverage for PA-LTC, causing doctors' recommendations to be ignored and denying residents the care they are entitled to. Third, privacy rules concerning data use may undermine developers' ability to train accurate AI systems, limiting their usefulness in PA-LTC contexts. Fourth, the importance of obtaining consent before AI is used and discussions about how that care should continue if there are concerns about an ongoing decline in cognition. Together, these considerations elevate existing frameworks and adapt them to the contextspecific case of PA-LTC. It is hoped that future research will examine the legal implications of these matters in each of these specific cases. (c) 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of AMDA - The Society for Post-Acute and Long-Term Care Medicine. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
KW - Ai
KW - Artificial intelligence
KW - Ethics
KW - Law
KW - Pa-ltc
KW - Residents
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85198266770&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jamda.2024.105105
DO - 10.1016/j.jamda.2024.105105
M3 - Article
C2 - 38909630
AN - SCOPUS:85198266770
SN - 1525-8610
VL - 25
JO - Journal of the American Medical Directors Association
JF - Journal of the American Medical Directors Association
IS - 9
M1 - 105105
ER -