TY - JOUR
T1 - Life cycle environmental impact assessments and comparisons of alternative fuels for clean vehicles
AU - Bicer, Yusuf
AU - Dincer, Ibrahim
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 Elsevier B.V.
PY - 2018/5
Y1 - 2018/5
N2 - In this study, a comparative life cycle assessment of internal combustion engine-based vehicles fueled by various fuels, ranging from hydrogen to gasoline, is conducted in addition to electric and hybrid electric vehicles. Three types of vehicles are considered, namely; internal combustion engine vehicles using gasoline, diesel, liquefied petroleum gas, methanol, compressed natural gas, hydrogen and ammonia; hybrid electric vehicles using 50% gasoline and 50% electricity; and electric only vehicles for comprehensive comparison and environmental impact assessment. The processes are analyzed from raw material extraction to vehicle disposal using process-based life cycle assessment methodology. In order to reflect the sustainability of the vehicles, seven different environmental impact categories are considered: abiotic depletion, acidification, eutrophication, global warming, human toxicity, ozone layer depletion and terrestrial ecotoxicity. The primary energy resources are selected based on currently utilized options to indicate the actual performances of the vehicles. The results show that electric and plug-in hybrid electric vehicles result in higher human toxicity, terrestrial ecotoxicity and acidification values because of manufacturing and maintenance phases. In contrast, hydrogen vehicles yield the most environmentally benign option because of high energy density and low fuel consumption during operation.
AB - In this study, a comparative life cycle assessment of internal combustion engine-based vehicles fueled by various fuels, ranging from hydrogen to gasoline, is conducted in addition to electric and hybrid electric vehicles. Three types of vehicles are considered, namely; internal combustion engine vehicles using gasoline, diesel, liquefied petroleum gas, methanol, compressed natural gas, hydrogen and ammonia; hybrid electric vehicles using 50% gasoline and 50% electricity; and electric only vehicles for comprehensive comparison and environmental impact assessment. The processes are analyzed from raw material extraction to vehicle disposal using process-based life cycle assessment methodology. In order to reflect the sustainability of the vehicles, seven different environmental impact categories are considered: abiotic depletion, acidification, eutrophication, global warming, human toxicity, ozone layer depletion and terrestrial ecotoxicity. The primary energy resources are selected based on currently utilized options to indicate the actual performances of the vehicles. The results show that electric and plug-in hybrid electric vehicles result in higher human toxicity, terrestrial ecotoxicity and acidification values because of manufacturing and maintenance phases. In contrast, hydrogen vehicles yield the most environmentally benign option because of high energy density and low fuel consumption during operation.
KW - Alternative fuels
KW - Energy
KW - Environmental impact
KW - Life cycle assessment
KW - Transportation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85041549329&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.01.036
DO - 10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.01.036
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85041549329
SN - 0921-3449
VL - 132
SP - 141
EP - 157
JO - Resources, Conservation and Recycling
JF - Resources, Conservation and Recycling
ER -