TY - JOUR
T1 - Liquified hydrogen vs. liquified renewable methane
T2 - Evaluating energy consumption and infrastructure for sustainable fuels
AU - Al-Breiki, Mohammed
AU - Bicer, Yusuf
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 The Author(s)
PY - 2023/10/15
Y1 - 2023/10/15
N2 - This study aims to assess the energy consumption characteristics of various fuels, namely liquified natural gas, liquefied renewable methane, and liquefied hydrogen from production to overseas transportation, by covering broad color spectra of grey, blue, and green. A quantitative assessment is implemented to calculate how much energy is consumed to produce, store, and transport fuels. Carbon capture scenarios are also considered, along with boil-off gas recovery and utilization options for increased value chain effectiveness. Thereafter, a qualitative assessment is performed to compare the use of fuels from four perspectives: (i) technology, (ii) infrastructure, (iii) scalability, and (iv) regulations. The obtained quantitative results indicate that the energy consumption to produce liquified natural gas, liquefied renewable methane, and liquefied green hydrogen is about 0.49, 31.4, and 62.3 kWhe/kg of fuel, respectively. The energy consumption to store liquified hydrogen in a 2,000 m3 on-land storage tank for one day while recovering 100% of the generated boil-off gas is about 4,840 kWh. Moreover, the qualitative results indicate that the infrastructure is ready, and regulations are available to use liquefied renewable methane as fuel, whereas the infrastructure of liquified hydrogen still needs to be ready, and the associated regulations require amendments.
AB - This study aims to assess the energy consumption characteristics of various fuels, namely liquified natural gas, liquefied renewable methane, and liquefied hydrogen from production to overseas transportation, by covering broad color spectra of grey, blue, and green. A quantitative assessment is implemented to calculate how much energy is consumed to produce, store, and transport fuels. Carbon capture scenarios are also considered, along with boil-off gas recovery and utilization options for increased value chain effectiveness. Thereafter, a qualitative assessment is performed to compare the use of fuels from four perspectives: (i) technology, (ii) infrastructure, (iii) scalability, and (iv) regulations. The obtained quantitative results indicate that the energy consumption to produce liquified natural gas, liquefied renewable methane, and liquefied green hydrogen is about 0.49, 31.4, and 62.3 kWhe/kg of fuel, respectively. The energy consumption to store liquified hydrogen in a 2,000 m3 on-land storage tank for one day while recovering 100% of the generated boil-off gas is about 4,840 kWh. Moreover, the qualitative results indicate that the infrastructure is ready, and regulations are available to use liquefied renewable methane as fuel, whereas the infrastructure of liquified hydrogen still needs to be ready, and the associated regulations require amendments.
KW - Boil-off gas
KW - Carbon capture
KW - Clean energy
KW - Energy carrier
KW - Liquefaction
KW - Synthetic natural gas
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85160743309&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.fuel.2023.128779
DO - 10.1016/j.fuel.2023.128779
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85160743309
SN - 0016-2361
VL - 350
JO - Fuel
JF - Fuel
M1 - 128779
ER -