Abstract
The concept of hakimiyya (sovereignty), as understood by its leading proponents, refers to the notion that it is God, rather than humans, Who possesses the prerogative to make laws. A concomitant of this is that Muslims with political power and authority must recognise the supremacy of Islamic law. This notion, perhaps most notably articulated in modern times by Abu al-AMODIFIER LETTER LEFT HALF RINGla Mawdudi, may be viewed as the rearticulation of ideas latent in the premodern Islamic juristic tradition, but whose modern incarnation as hakimiyya emerged in response to the legislative norms of the liberal colonial state. Despite its modern articulation, and against the views of several scholars, I argue that hakimiyya qua sovereignty finds its antecedents quite clearly in the Islamic scholarly tradition. Such an understanding leads into a discussion of how Islamic conceptions of sovereignty can help us reassess influential Western articulations of the concept. I also show that Mawdudi's influential younger contemporary, the Islamist alim Abu al-Hasan MODIFIER LETTER LEFT HALF RINGAli Nadwi, upholds hakimiyya despite his critique of Mawdudi and Sayyid Qu?b's conceptions of it. I conclude with a brief reflection on how our understanding of hakimiyya as sovereignty can help us provincialise Europe in global historical studies.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | PII S1356186321000675 |
Pages (from-to) | 355-376 |
Number of pages | 22 |
Journal | Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society |
Volume | 32 |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 1 Apr 2022 |
Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Hakimiyya
- Islam and modernity
- Islamic law
- Islamic political thought
- Mawdudi
- Qu?b
- Sovereignty