TY - JOUR
T1 - Machine Learning-Based Approach for Identifying Research Gaps
T2 - COVID-19 as a Case Study
AU - Abd-alrazaq, Alaa
AU - Nashwan, Abdulqadir J.
AU - Shah, Zubair
AU - Abujaber, Ahmad
AU - Alhuwail, Dari
AU - Schneider, Jens
AU - AlSaad, Rawan
AU - Ali, Hazrat
AU - Alomoush, Waleed
AU - Ahmed, Arfan
AU - Aziz, Sarah
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 JMIR Publications Inc.. All rights reserved.
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - Background: Research gaps refer to unanswered questions in the existing body of knowledge, either due to a lack of studies or inconclusive results. Research gaps are essential starting points and motivation in scientific research. Traditional methods for identifying research gaps, such as literature reviews and expert opinions, can be time consuming, labor intensive, and prone to bias. They may also fall short when dealing with rapidly evolving or time -sensitive subjects. Thus, innovative scalable approaches are needed to identify research gaps, systematically assess the literature, and prioritize areas for further study in the topic of interest. Objective: In this paper, we propose a machine learning-based approach for identifying research gaps through the analysis of scientific literature. We used the COVID-19 pandemic as a case study. Methods: We conducted an analysis to identify research gaps in COVID-19 literature using the COVID-19 Open Research (CORD -19) data set, which comprises 1,121,433 papers related to the COVID-19 pandemic. Our approach is based on the BERTopic topic modeling technique, which leverages transformers and class -based term frequency -inverse document frequency to create dense clusters allowing for easily interpretable topics. Our BERTopic-based approach involves 3 stages: embedding documents, clustering documents (dimension reduction and clustering), and representing topics (generating candidates and maximizing candidate relevance). Results: After applying the study selection criteria, we included 33,206 abstracts in the analysis of this study. The final list of research gaps identified 21 different areas, which were grouped into 6 principal topics. These topics were: "virus of COVID-19," "risk factors of COVID-19," "prevention of COVID-19," "treatment of COVID-19," "health care delivery during COVID-19," "and impact of COVID-19." The most prominent topic, observed in over half of the analyzed studies, was "the impact of COVID-19." Conclusions: The proposed machine learning-based approach has the potential to identify research gaps in scientific literature. This study is not intended to replace individual literature research within a selected topic. Instead, it can serve as a guide to formulate precise literature search queries in specific areas associated with research questions that previous publications have earmarked for future exploration. Future research should leverage an up-to-date list of studies that are retrieved from the most common databases in the target area. When feasible, full texts or, at minimum, discussion sections should be analyzed rather than limiting their analysis to abstracts. Furthermore, future studies could evaluate more efficient modeling algorithms, especially those combining topic modeling with statistical uncertainty quantification, such as conformal prediction.
AB - Background: Research gaps refer to unanswered questions in the existing body of knowledge, either due to a lack of studies or inconclusive results. Research gaps are essential starting points and motivation in scientific research. Traditional methods for identifying research gaps, such as literature reviews and expert opinions, can be time consuming, labor intensive, and prone to bias. They may also fall short when dealing with rapidly evolving or time -sensitive subjects. Thus, innovative scalable approaches are needed to identify research gaps, systematically assess the literature, and prioritize areas for further study in the topic of interest. Objective: In this paper, we propose a machine learning-based approach for identifying research gaps through the analysis of scientific literature. We used the COVID-19 pandemic as a case study. Methods: We conducted an analysis to identify research gaps in COVID-19 literature using the COVID-19 Open Research (CORD -19) data set, which comprises 1,121,433 papers related to the COVID-19 pandemic. Our approach is based on the BERTopic topic modeling technique, which leverages transformers and class -based term frequency -inverse document frequency to create dense clusters allowing for easily interpretable topics. Our BERTopic-based approach involves 3 stages: embedding documents, clustering documents (dimension reduction and clustering), and representing topics (generating candidates and maximizing candidate relevance). Results: After applying the study selection criteria, we included 33,206 abstracts in the analysis of this study. The final list of research gaps identified 21 different areas, which were grouped into 6 principal topics. These topics were: "virus of COVID-19," "risk factors of COVID-19," "prevention of COVID-19," "treatment of COVID-19," "health care delivery during COVID-19," "and impact of COVID-19." The most prominent topic, observed in over half of the analyzed studies, was "the impact of COVID-19." Conclusions: The proposed machine learning-based approach has the potential to identify research gaps in scientific literature. This study is not intended to replace individual literature research within a selected topic. Instead, it can serve as a guide to formulate precise literature search queries in specific areas associated with research questions that previous publications have earmarked for future exploration. Future research should leverage an up-to-date list of studies that are retrieved from the most common databases in the target area. When feasible, full texts or, at minimum, discussion sections should be analyzed rather than limiting their analysis to abstracts. Furthermore, future studies could evaluate more efficient modeling algorithms, especially those combining topic modeling with statistical uncertainty quantification, such as conformal prediction.
KW - Bert
KW - BERTopic
KW - Covid-19
KW - Covid
KW - Nlp
KW - SARS-CoV-2
KW - Coronavirus
KW - Literature review
KW - Machine learning
KW - Natural language processing
KW - Research gap
KW - Research gaps
KW - Research topic
KW - Research topics
KW - Review methodology
KW - Review methods
KW - Scientific literature
KW - Text analysis
KW - Topic clustering
UR - https://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=hbku_researchportal&SrcAuth=WosAPI&KeyUT=WOS:001183499200002&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=WOS_CPL
U2 - 10.2196/49411
DO - 10.2196/49411
M3 - Article
C2 - 38441952
SN - 2561-326X
VL - 8
JO - JMIR Formative Research
JF - JMIR Formative Research
M1 - e49411
ER -