Methodological Americanism: Disciplinary senility and intellectual hegemonies in (American) public administration

Kim Moloney*, Meng Hsuan Chou, Philip Osei, Yonique Campbell

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In this introduction, we introduce the concept of methodological Americanism to describe and explain the epistemological problem plaguing the public administration discipline. We argue that the discipline, dominated by US-focused analyses, is methodologically nationalist and White and represents a hegemonic intellectualism that limits what is “knowable.” To ensure continual disciplinary relevance of public administration studies, we propose that epistemological diversity—achievable by reshaping the disciplinary table—is the way forward. We conclude by summarizing how the articles in this first of two Special Issues contribute to paving the way toward epistemological diversity.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)261-276
Number of pages16
JournalAdministrative Theory and Praxis
Volume44
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2022

Keywords

  • Methodological Americanism
  • Methodological Nationalism
  • Methodological Whiteness

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Methodological Americanism: Disciplinary senility and intellectual hegemonies in (American) public administration'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this