TY - JOUR
T1 - Multiscale Bayesian PCA for robust process modeling of a Fischer–Tropsch bench scale process
AU - Malluhi, Byanne
AU - Basha, Nour
AU - Fezai, Radhia
AU - Ibrahim, Gasim
AU - Choudhury, Hanif A.
AU - Challiwala, Mohamed
AU - Nounou, Hazem
AU - Elbashir, Nimir
AU - Nounou, Mohamed
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023
PY - 2023/9/15
Y1 - 2023/9/15
N2 - Building a good process model is critical for process monitoring technologies which ensure process safety, reliability, and profitability. In this work, we develop a Multiscale Bayesian PCA (MS-BPCA) algorithm and use it to model a real Fischer–Tropsch (FT) pilot plant. We demonstrate the algorithm's superior and robust performance in dealing with autocorrelation and noise contamination compared to BPCA and Multiscale PCA. The modeling performance of BPCA depends on the accuracy of the likelihood and prior parameters. Therefore, we explore various techniques (multiscale filtering, polynomial approximation, and PCA) to empirically estimate these parameters. Furthermore, we study the limitations of the BPCA modeling algorithm when its assumptions of gaussian data and independent noise are violated. Finally, this work will compare the modeling performance of all techniques (PCA, Bayesian PCA, Multiscale PCA, and Multiscale Bayesian PCA) with real data collected from a state-of-the-art bench-scale Fischer–Tropsch (FT) process.
AB - Building a good process model is critical for process monitoring technologies which ensure process safety, reliability, and profitability. In this work, we develop a Multiscale Bayesian PCA (MS-BPCA) algorithm and use it to model a real Fischer–Tropsch (FT) pilot plant. We demonstrate the algorithm's superior and robust performance in dealing with autocorrelation and noise contamination compared to BPCA and Multiscale PCA. The modeling performance of BPCA depends on the accuracy of the likelihood and prior parameters. Therefore, we explore various techniques (multiscale filtering, polynomial approximation, and PCA) to empirically estimate these parameters. Furthermore, we study the limitations of the BPCA modeling algorithm when its assumptions of gaussian data and independent noise are violated. Finally, this work will compare the modeling performance of all techniques (PCA, Bayesian PCA, Multiscale PCA, and Multiscale Bayesian PCA) with real data collected from a state-of-the-art bench-scale Fischer–Tropsch (FT) process.
KW - Bayesian PCA
KW - Data-driven modeling
KW - Fischer-Tropsch process
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85166934943&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.chemolab.2023.104921
DO - 10.1016/j.chemolab.2023.104921
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85166934943
SN - 0169-7439
VL - 240
JO - Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems
JF - Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems
M1 - 104921
ER -