TY - JOUR
T1 - Oncogenic states dictate the prognostic and predictive connotations of intratumoral immune response
AU - Roelands, Jessica
AU - Hendrickx, Wouter
AU - Zoppoli, Gabriele
AU - Mall, Raghvendra
AU - Saad, Mohamad
AU - Halliwill, Kyle
AU - Curigliano, Giuseppe
AU - Rinchai, Darawan
AU - Decock, Julie
AU - Delogu, Lucia G.
AU - Turan, Tolga
AU - Samayoa, Josue
AU - Chouchane, Lotfi
AU - Ballestrero, Alberto
AU - Wang, Ena
AU - Finetti, Pascal
AU - Bertucci, Francois
AU - Miller, Lance D.
AU - Galon, Jerome
AU - Marincola, Francesco M.
AU - Kuppen, Peter J.K.
AU - Ceccarelli, Michele
AU - Bedognetti, Davide
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
PY - 2020/5/5
Y1 - 2020/5/5
N2 - Background An immune active cancer phenotype typified by a T helper 1 (Th-1) immune response has been associated with increased responsiveness to immunotherapy and favorable prognosis in some but not all cancer types. The reason of this differential prognostic connotation remains unknown. Methods To explore the contextual prognostic value of cancer immune phenotypes, we applied a multimodal pan-cancer analysis among 31 different histologies (9282 patients), encompassing immune and oncogenic transcriptomic analysis, mutational and neoantigen load and copy number variations. Results We demonstrated that the favorable prognostic connotation conferred by the presence of a Th-1 immune response was abolished in tumors displaying specific tumor-cell intrinsic attributes such as high transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-β) signaling and low proliferation capacity. This observation was independent of mutation rate. We validated this observation in the context of immune checkpoint inhibition. WNT-β catenin, barrier molecules, Notch, hedgehog, mismatch repair, telomerase activity and AMPK signaling were the pathways most coherently associated with an immune silent phenotype together with mutations of driver genes including IDH1/2, FOXA2, HDAC3, PSIP1, MAP3K1, KRAS, NRAS, EGFR, FGFR3, WNT5A and IRF7. Conclusions This is the first systematic study demonstrating that the prognostic and predictive role of a bona fide favorable intratumoral immune response is dependent on the disposition of specific oncogenic pathways. This information could be used to refine stratification algorithms and prioritize hierarchically relevant targets for combination therapies.
AB - Background An immune active cancer phenotype typified by a T helper 1 (Th-1) immune response has been associated with increased responsiveness to immunotherapy and favorable prognosis in some but not all cancer types. The reason of this differential prognostic connotation remains unknown. Methods To explore the contextual prognostic value of cancer immune phenotypes, we applied a multimodal pan-cancer analysis among 31 different histologies (9282 patients), encompassing immune and oncogenic transcriptomic analysis, mutational and neoantigen load and copy number variations. Results We demonstrated that the favorable prognostic connotation conferred by the presence of a Th-1 immune response was abolished in tumors displaying specific tumor-cell intrinsic attributes such as high transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-β) signaling and low proliferation capacity. This observation was independent of mutation rate. We validated this observation in the context of immune checkpoint inhibition. WNT-β catenin, barrier molecules, Notch, hedgehog, mismatch repair, telomerase activity and AMPK signaling were the pathways most coherently associated with an immune silent phenotype together with mutations of driver genes including IDH1/2, FOXA2, HDAC3, PSIP1, MAP3K1, KRAS, NRAS, EGFR, FGFR3, WNT5A and IRF7. Conclusions This is the first systematic study demonstrating that the prognostic and predictive role of a bona fide favorable intratumoral immune response is dependent on the disposition of specific oncogenic pathways. This information could be used to refine stratification algorithms and prioritize hierarchically relevant targets for combination therapies.
KW - cytotoxicity, immunologic
KW - gene expression profiling
KW - genetic markers
KW - genome Instability
KW - immunotherapy
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85084401065&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1136/jitc-2020-000617
DO - 10.1136/jitc-2020-000617
M3 - Article
C2 - 32376723
AN - SCOPUS:85084401065
SN - 2051-1426
VL - 8
JO - Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer
JF - Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer
IS - 1
M1 - e000617
ER -