Switching costs and bank competition: Evidence from dual banking economies

Siti K. Rizkiah, Mustafa Disli*, Kinan Salim, Lutfi A. Razak

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

There is a strong theoretical foundation that demonstrates costs of switching as one of the main barriers in creating a healthy level of competition. Switching costs might even be more prevalent for Islamic banks due to Shariah dimension since Shariah driven customers are limited to only switch to banks that offer Shariah-compliant products. However, the banking market is not completely segmented as Islamic banking clients can switch to conventional banks, and vice versa. This paper examines the degree of switching costs in Islamic and conventional banks, and investigates its influence on bank competition in dual banking economies. We find that conventional banks inherit higher switching costs than Islamic banks. The finding is consistent for all countries in the sample except for Malaysia and Bahrain. We also find that switching costs during the global financial crisis are higher than the rest of the years. We further document a significant negative relationship between switching costs and bank competition, while this relationship is more pronounced for Islamic banks.

Original languageEnglish
Article number101445
JournalJournal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money
Volume75
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2021

Keywords

  • Dual banking system
  • Islamic banking
  • Market power
  • Switching costs

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Switching costs and bank competition: Evidence from dual banking economies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this