The Flawed Foundations of Social Equity in Public Administration: A Racial Contract Theory Critique

Kim Moloney*, Rupert Lewis

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The social equity concept of American public administration traces its roots to the philosophies of John Rawls, John Locke, and Jean-Jacques Rousseau. We suggest such fixed positionalities limit what is knowable about social equity. This is due to their restricted considerations of America’s racialized origins. By introducing Charles Mills’ racial contract theory to the public administration discipline, we suggest that the assumed “social contract” at America’s origins was racialized, was disconnected from its historical actuality, and was born of exploitation. Racialized epistemological foundations alter how the social equity concept is understood. The implications matter for our disciplinary understanding of social equity and its origins.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)131-136
Number of pages6
JournalPerspectives on Public Management and Governance
Volume6
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2023

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Flawed Foundations of Social Equity in Public Administration: A Racial Contract Theory Critique'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this