Abstract
In the first half of the twentieth century, the legal landscape of the Arabian sheikhdoms was pluralistic and fragmented. The legal actors who settled disputes included local rulers, qāīs, pearl merchants, tribal shaykhs, and British officials. Drawing on fatwas and correspondence between religious scholars and notables in Baghdad, Cairo, Damascus, Doha, Kuwait and Manama, I examine how Islamic law shaped pearling-the region's central economic activity-during this critical juncture. I show that Islamic law furnished a structure and repertoire of argumentation that actors in the industry were able to mobilize selectively. I argue that seasonal questions about diver obligations during Ramadan led to broader debates about the economic arrangements that structured the trade, in particular usury and labor coercion. These debates reflect shifting power dynamics in the Gulf and the impact of new ideas about Islam and capitalism in the age of print.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 457-494 |
Number of pages | 38 |
Journal | Islamic Law and Society |
Volume | 29 |
Issue number | 4 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2022 |
Keywords
- Ramadan
- Salafism
- capitalism
- debt
- diving courts
- pearl trade
- sharī'a
- usury