The substitution hypothesis of agency conflicts: Evidence on Shariah compliant equities

Wajahat Azmi, Zaheer Anwer*, Shamsher Mohamad, Mohamed Eskandar Shah

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

According to the substitution hypothesis and recent evidence, firms that are better governed carry less debt and experience fewer agency problems. This may also imply that firms with lower debt are better governed and experience lower agency costs. We test this hypothesis by comparing the agency costs of Shariah compliant (SC, and therefore low debt) and Shariah noncompliant (SNC) firms, using a proprietary dataset comprising constituents of the Dow Jones Islamic index for the period 2006–2015. The findings support the hypothesis but are contingent on the firm's idiosyncratic risk; SC firms with low idiosyncratic risk have higher agency costs.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)90-103
Number of pages14
JournalGlobal Finance Journal
Volume41
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2019
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Agency costs
  • Capital structure
  • Corporate governance
  • Shariah compliant equities
  • Stock screening

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The substitution hypothesis of agency conflicts: Evidence on Shariah compliant equities'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this