Unpacking policy portfolios: primary and secondary aspects of tool use in policy mixes

Azad Singh Bali, Michael Howlett*, M. Ramesh

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

24 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A recent resurgence of interest in policy design has fostered renewed efforts to better understand how specific combinations of policy tools arise and shape policy outcomes. However, to date, these efforts have been stymied by under-theorization of the dif- ferent purposes to which tools are directed in policy mixes and a corresponding failure to acknowledge both these in conceptual work on the subject and in policy practice. Existing frameworks do not adequately recognize the complexity of contemporary policy tool mixes, especially their hybrid and multilayered features, and how procedural and substantial tools operate and interact together in priority and supportive roles. To close this gap, we propose a revised tool framework that distinguishes between first and second-order aspects of instruments used in policy mixes and highlights the particular salience of procedural tools within them.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)321-337
Number of pages17
JournalJournal of Asian Public Policy
Volume15
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2022
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Singapore
  • health policy
  • policy design
  • policy instruments
  • policy mixes
  • policy sciences
  • policy tools

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Unpacking policy portfolios: primary and secondary aspects of tool use in policy mixes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this