What types of perceived governance indicators matter the most for private investment in Middle East and North Africa

Ahmet Aysan*, Zeynep Ersoy, Marie Ange Véganzonès-Varoudakis

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

By using a simultaneous equations model, this paper establishes that the perceived quality of governance, which is measured by three different indicators "Quality of Administration", "Public Accountability" and "Political Stability", has a positive effect on the private investment decisions in the developing countries. Our model allows us to point out the fact that the mechanisms through which each type of indicator affects private investment are different. In additionto our primary result we also show that Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region could have attained a better private investment performance if it had reached a more advanced level of perceived institutions in last two decades. The low level of public accountability, among other governance deficiencies, was predominantly responsible for the deficiency in private investment in MENA.

Original languageEnglish
JournalEconomics Bulletin
Volume5
Issue number8
Publication statusPublished - 8 Apr 2007
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'What types of perceived governance indicators matter the most for private investment in Middle East and North Africa'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this